Tuesday, 11 September 2012

Changing forms of storytelling


Changing forms of storytelling



Journalism is storytelling with a purpose. As a student of journalism, we are often confronted with  issues regarding the morality and ethics associated with the profession. Even though ethics and  morals are areas which changes from person to person, organization to organization. A persons value may not be shared by the other person. Certain allegation are constantly raised against the media such as sensationalizing events, neglecting certain sections of the society, stereotyping or being disproportionately negative in certain cases. So can there be some standards or principles which should govern the field of journalism. Issues regarding Principles and ethics have been raised time and again. Tom Rosential and and Bill Kovach in their book “ The elements of journalism” examines the character of journalism at the end of the twentieth century. It discusses the principles that underlie journalism. According to the authors there must be a balance about what the reader knows and what they want and also give what they need but cannot anticipate.
New forms of storytelling have emerged in the field of journalism. Some suggest that the definition of journalism has exploded with by technology as anybody with a modem and a computer can claim to be a journalist. Technology is transforming citizens from passive consumers of news produced by professionals into active participants who can assemble their own journalism. With new technologies and new efficiencies entering newsrooms there is a change in the dynamics between the consumers and information providers and the line between news and opinion can easily be blurred  which might imperil the credibility of the practitioners and their organization. So certain principles must be imposed by the journalists on themselves. Certain things must always be clear regarding the moral issues of journalism such as the journalist’s loyalty with the citizens, a tendency for verifying information or cross checking, and provision for public criticism and compromise and the professions obligation to truth.

Deepmoni Gogoi

Monday, 10 September 2012

From Propaganda to Anna -Ugen Bhutia


 "I want to thank the media for spreading our message to all my countrymen for the past 12 days...this is a success for them as well." Anna Hazare.

On April 5th 2011, anti-corruption activist Anna Hazare and his team geared for the agitation against the endemic political corruption in India. Their hunger strike in Jantar Mantar (New Delhi) attracted the floods of mass media which gave the larger hype to the issue. This helped team Anna to escalate its agitation and win support for their cause.
The intervention of media, resulting in escalation of conflict is not a new phenomenon. From the very initial era of mass media, it has played an important role in feeding the information in the minds of people for different reasons. The information produced by any party through media can be either neutral or biased, but in all the cases, it is produced with some objectives. And during the time of conflict, all the stakeholders of the conflict tend to gain the support from the media, because winning the media’s support can help in winning the support of the masses. 
But this advent was not a natural process, it needed a large amount of investments from the private players. This resulted in the commercialization of media and press. Now businessmen became the owners whose ultimate aims were profits. Therefore, the upper-middle and the elites section of the society who can afford to purchase these technologies became the prime targets. Apart from these two sections, people belonging to other low income classes are totally ignored. Any event that occurs in high profile society makes a “headline”, no mater it’s a sports, health or investigative news, one thing is sure, it will talk about the elites. One example, is media coverage of first “Formula 1” racing in India. Prior to the race, every news channels and papers started talking about the history and champions of Formula 1. After, they went further and congratulate F1 organizers for successful event. Limits were crossed when F1 was stated better in compare to Commonwealth Games in India in terms of organizing the event. Though it’s true that CWG games brought many controversies, there is another way to look at the issue. Private news channels, whose owners are the business tycoons will surely advocate for the privatization of sports too. Even the F1 was not a clean event, many controversies accompanied it. But elites-favourable media did its best to hide it. One of this was the land controversy.
As stated at the beginning, stakeholders of the conflict tend to gain the support from the media. And once media comes under control, it becomes the tool of propaganda. The early critic of mass media Walter Lippmann in 1920s claimed that propaganda had already become “a regular organ of popular government”. The ‘propaganda model’ brought by Herman and Noam Chomsky in their book ‘Manufacturing Consent’ focuses on the inequality of wealth and power and its multilevel effects on mass-media interest and choices which states that the money and power are able to filter out the news fit to print and allow the government and dominant private interest to get their message across to the public.
Back in recent history, media has been useful tool of propaganda during First and Second World War. The present connotation of word ‘propaganda’ came during this period. Media became the additional weapon of wars since then. One of the best examples was, U.S government using the Associated Press to incite U.S citizens for declaration of war. President Wilson gave the German coded message intercepted by British Intelligence Service to AP, which was a propaganda ‘plant’. It asked Mexico to seek adherence and military support from Japan for a Mexican-Japanese attack on the U.S. from the Southwest if America went to war against Germany. During the Vietnam War propaganda was used to show that the war was between the Vietnamese against Vietnamese and the U.S intervened in the support of democracy and freedom.
In India, the recent event of Lokpal Bill showed us how mass media can even fulfill the purpose of propaganda for them who want the common consent. When mass media gave its interest in team Anna’s agitation, team Anna constantly created news events for live TV and media on the other hand gave gigantic coverage to the team. More talks were done on the life of Anna Hazare and other members, than the issue itself i.e. Lokpal Bill. Neither the team itself nor anyone else would have imagined (hoped) about the support that they were going to get due to the use of mass media. New media like internet, text mgs, played important role in mobilizing people and made Anna Hazara a successful campaigner and created his image of 21st century Gandhi. 









 

Sunday, 9 September 2012


The Shadows of Culture Extinction

Saurabh Thapa

‘Who is he and what is he playing?’ asked a small Nepali boy to his mother pointing towards a ‘Gaine’ or a ‘Sarangi player’ in a busy market place. It is sad to know that many of the young generation teens have very little knowledge about their rich cultural heritage. Cultural homogeneity, an effect of Globalization have disrupted and confused many of the younger generations regarding their cultures around the world. But excluding these cultural effects, the rise in the standards of living has also a great role to play in leading many of the cultures towards the verge of extinction.
A Gaine, (by the profession) in the district of Darjeeling, has a lot of concerns regarding this context. He explains that it is very hard to live a decent livelihood only with the help of his occupation in the modern standards of living. The constant rise in the prices of daily needed commodities has made it very difficult for his line of work to cope-up with the harsh and expensive world. He worries that the youngsters of his community are slowly leaving their profession and are opting for other jobs for a better life. In this pace whole of their community would be extinct in a matter of time.
Media, specially the television and internet, has a great dominance over the recent world. These mediums of communications are empowered with the great power of persuasion. Therefore, it does what it’s meant to do, act as a powerful tool of globalization and sow the seeds of some influential cultures upon other communities. Better known as ‘Mass culture’ and ‘Pop culture’, these are widely accepted by a huge heterogeneous mass on the planet. Many of the cultures are dying because of the massive adaptation of Mass culture by not only the youngsters but also their parents. Adaptation of mass or the pop culture not only mean to adopt the most accepted culture and trends of the world but it also means to let go of their long held and accepted ethnic culture and rituals.
It can be witnessed in the district of Darjeeling and the state of Sikkim (even in many north-eastern parts of India) that a huge number of teens have been greatly influenced by the Korean culture. They mostly watch Korean movies and T.V shows and even dress like them. Some have even started learning Korean language and we can see a lot of names changed into Korean names in their Facebook profiles. Though these acts may seem harmless but in a context it is slowly ‘deterritorializing’ the regional culture and is ‘reterritorialized’ by the Korean one. But no one can say whether this is a temporary or a permanent process. Though it can be rightfully said, that in the coming future the persuasiveness of Korean culture may be instantly replaced by another popular culture. These can be seen as an evidence that our culture is slowly losing its grip on the young generation teens. However, this is only one of the examples prevalent in these parts. Other cultures such as Hiphop culture, Heavy metal culture, etc, has also slowly started its influence within the youths of the region.
The ignorance or the negligence by the people of any community towards their culture may result in the total disappearance of what portrays their identity, their rich culture.  A culture not only signifies the long held belief, customs, rituals etc, but it truly helps to identify and give identity to any specific community within the world. But with a very high rate of mass culture adaptation, communities are now slowly merging with each other. The uniqueness that once differentiated one culture from another is slowly fading away.
Evolution is a part of human characteristic and like everything else, the world now is experiencing cultural change in the name of cultural evolution. But when we talk about evolution, need or the requirement to do so plays an important part to justify it. There is always a reason and necessity, which is normally for the survival for anything to evolve in the planet we live in. Keeping this in mind the question arises, Is there any need for cultural change regarding the context of human survival? Or is the change necessary in-order to walk in the footsteps of modernization?
The ongoing traditions and cultures that have been passed from generations to generations seems more like a silhouette in the modern world. Every thing’s changed in the name of modernity. Not only in the perspective of culture but the so called modern world has led the people to leave their ancestral settlements and move to bigger cities. As a proof of the persuasive and very influential power of the media, it can be seen that the life styles advertised by the big media houses have been very successful in changing the livelihood of more than half of the population of the world, in some way or the other. These changes may be both good as well as bad but it is all upto the people to recognize and act accordingly. It totally depends upon what you adapt and what you let go of. The main challenge here is to maintain a balance between the inherited culture and the new culture adapted. The adaptation of new culture may not always be harmful but to let go of the culture passed on from generation to generation by our ancestors may prove to be very devastating in some context.   

(Published at Sikkim Express newspaper on 29th august,2012)